"High Five!" and "F#^%!"
The cowards who planted the bombs in
We urge the government to remove people in this country from harms way, as the Spanish government acted to remove its people from harm, by ending the occupation of
"HIGH FIVE!!!"
But then they might have made the mistake of going over to Andrew Sullivan's site only to find this:
"And if, as your MO indicates, you're an al-Qaeda group, then you're out of your tiny minds.
Because if this is a message to Tony Blair, we've got news for you. We don't much like our government ourselves, or what they do in our name. But, listen very clearly. We'll deal with that ourselves. We're
And that's because we're better than you. Everyone is better than you. Our city works. We rather like it. And we're going to go about our lives. We're going to take care of the lives you ruined. And then we're going to work. And we're going down the pub.
So you can pack up your bombs, put them in your arseholes, and get the fuck out of our city."
"S#^%!"
Then they head over to the Democratic Underground.
. . . well, we all saw this happening...as long as Blair and Bush continue their war crimes, this will continue. They are responsible for everything evil that occurs as a result of their immoral illegal war. God help the people who get caught in the middle of Bush/Blair insanity.
"HIGH FIVE!!!" But wait a moment- heading over to Europhobia they find:
17:30 - Blair statement - "I've just attended a meeting of the government's emergency committee... there will be announcements as soon as possible... there will of course now be the most intense police and emergency service action to make sure we bring those responsible to justice. I would also like to pay tribute to the stoicism and resilience of the people of
"S#^%!"
For reassurance they head over to the Daily Kos, and are not disappointed.
THE PRESIDENT: "We are fighting these terrorists with our military in
Well, that didn't work out quite as planned, did it?
"HIGH FIVE!"
The first rule regarding a public statement after a terrorist attack is:
DON'T SAY WHAT THE TERRORISTS WANT TO HEAR. IT ENCOURAGES MORE ATTACKS!
The second rule:
DON'T SAY WHAT THE TERRORISTS WANT TO HEAR. IT ENCOURAGES MORE ATTACKS!
Not everyone abides by this rule. So now we get to hear about how Bush is responsible for this because we went to war in
I hope the UPC, and other methodologies meant to bring left and right together for civil disagreement, will survive this. Tony Blair said- "When they try to divide us they will not succeed and our resolve will hold firm..." I hope he is right, but I fear it is wishful thinking. Those who opposed the war in
3 Comments:
At 6:29 AM, Cernig said…
Hi Hrak,
DON'T SAY WHAT THE TERRORISTS WANT TO HEAR. IT ENCOURAGES MORE ATTACKS!
Nice to hear a conservative assault free speech...but-
So if the people saying what the terrorists want to hear (and which group is that? The rightwing UK press thinks it's the people who talk "us and them" sectarian division who hand the Islamists more power) didn't say it then there would be no more attacks like London? Absurd.
Utterly absurd.
Regards, C
At 9:12 AM, Harkonnendog said…
C,
It isn't an attack on free speech. An attack on free speech requires some kind of coercion- jail time, fines, whatever. It is a criticism of speech. Calling it an attack on free speech is the real attack on free speech. (I'm kidding)
Why is it absurd? If you reward terrorism that will, likely, spawn more terrorism, it seems to me. If you DON'T reward terrorism, why terrorize?
I agree with the UK press that "us and them" speech is another thing the terrorists want to hear- which, again, is a good reason all by itself not to talk that way.
I'm sure the terrorists want Brits to start lynching Muslims, too. And, again, (even if Brits didn't know how wrong that would be) the fact that the terrorist would like it to happen is more than good enough reason NOT to do it.
Cheers!
At 6:34 PM, shamanic said…
I agree with the UK press that "us and them" speech is another thing the terrorists want to hear- which, again, is a good reason all by itself not to talk that way.
So you wrote a post where you quoted only famously left-leaning sites and attributed high fives from the terrorists to what may well have been cherry-picked quotations?
You're completely unconscious, aren't you?
Post a Comment
<< Home